Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

silver-platter doctrine

Read a random definition: interpretation

A quick definition of silver-platter doctrine:

The silver-platter doctrine was a principle in criminal procedure that allowed a federal court to use evidence obtained illegally by a state police officer, as long as a federal officer did not participate in or request the search. However, this doctrine was rejected by the Supreme Court in 1960 in the case of Elkins v. United States.

A more thorough explanation:

The Silver-Platter Doctrine was a principle in criminal procedure that allowed a federal court to admit evidence obtained illegally by a state police officer, as long as a federal officer did not participate in or request the search.

For example, if a state police officer conducted an illegal search and seizure and found incriminating evidence, they could turn that evidence over to federal authorities who could then use it in court under the Silver-Platter Doctrine.

However, in 1960, the Supreme Court rejected this doctrine in the case of Elkins v. United States. The Court ruled that evidence obtained illegally by state officers could not be used in federal court, even if a federal officer was not involved in the search.

Overall, the Silver-Platter Doctrine was a controversial legal principle that allowed for the admission of illegally obtained evidence in certain circumstances, but it has since been overturned by the Supreme Court.

silver parachute | si malitia suppleat aetatem

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
pinkandblue
16:31
fart
IrishDinosaur
16:36
Mich R gang lesgooo
Did anyone else get that random get to know nova email?
HopefullyInLawSchool
17:21
Ya it was sent to all YM applicants
starfishies
17:37
Anyone get the NDLS email inviting you to apply for something even though they haven’t made a decision on your app yet
17:38
Better yet I got the email and I was rejected last month
starfishies
17:38
Wtf
starfishies
17:39
and the deadline is in like a week what is this
any cardozo movement?
BatmanBeyond
18:01
Sent a LOCI via portal, but I'm wondering if email would have gotten me a swifter response
BatmanBeyond
18:02
This whole hold/wait-list/reserve system is a headache
loci already?
BatmanBeyond
18:09
If the odds are like 1-2% I don't think it matters much by the numbers
12:11
I got the same NDLS email
OrangeThing
12:18
I think the user profiles are broken
19:29
Any word out of Notre Dame?
19:29
Only the invitation to apply for LSE
19:29
Anyone received a decision from NDLS?
19:50
when did u guys apply that just heard from umich? they havent even glanced at my app yet
0:30
how am i supposed to spy on people when profile links are broken?
Right. Broken links smh
I've been UR since first/second week of Jan, no updates otherwise, is that a bad sign? At or above median LSAT and above 75th gpa.
The profile links are not working for me. anybody else?
13:18
i’m in the same boat mastermonkey but with lower stats. i hope i hear back by mid march
CheeseIsMyLoveLanguage
13:24
@mastermonkey45: Looking at some of the recent decisions in relation to when they went complete, I'd say it's a good sign. It seems many declines were sent within about 5-6 weeks of completion. Given those were applications that were SENT in January, I'd say that means you're still solidly in the running. :)
14:30
Sent an app to OSU in early december and have STILL not heard back
Give it 4 more weeks at least. Everyone in this chat needs to wait longer.
TrumpSucks
19:58
@steelrift99: Same for me at Arizona
TrumpSucks
20:00
It is frustrating when people are admitted who applied after you. But that’s just part of the game I guess
was friday a umich R wave?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.