Warning

Info

Warning

Info

Warning

Info

LSDefine

Simple English definitions for legal terms

working papers

Read a random definition: fundamental term

A quick definition of working papers:

Working papers are documents that are required for certain things. For example, if a young person wants to work, they may need a work permit or employment certificate. This is to make sure that they are old enough to work and that they are safe while working. Working papers can also refer to the records that an accountant keeps when they audit a company's finances. These records show what the accountant did, what they found, and what they concluded about the company's finances.

A more thorough explanation:

Definition: Working papers are documents that serve as proof of a person's eligibility to work or as records of an audit conducted by an independent auditor.

A work permit is a type of working paper that is required in some states before a minor can be hired for a job. It is an employment certificate or permit that proves the minor is legally allowed to work.

In accounting, working papers refer to the records kept by an independent auditor during an audit. These records include the procedures followed, tests performed, information obtained, and conclusions reached during the audit.

For example, if an auditor is conducting an audit of a company's financial statements, they will keep detailed records of the steps they took to verify the accuracy of the information presented in the statements. These records serve as evidence of the auditor's work and help to ensure that the audit was conducted in a thorough and professional manner.

Overall, working papers are important documents that serve as proof of eligibility or as records of important processes and procedures. They are essential for ensuring compliance with laws and regulations and for maintaining accurate and reliable records.

working model | work-in-process

Warning

Info

General

General chat about the legal profession.
main_chatroom
👍 Chat vibe: 0 👎
Help us make LSD better!
Tell us what's important to you
yeah there are so many good cuisines in ithaca
renard99
22:31
@lilypadfrog: that’s a pity I’da be liking them all
texaslawhopefully
22:31
Only food I’m going to miss for sure if I leave Texas is texmex
22:31
waspy hasnt had thai food in ithaca yet. ithaca thai is so good
^^^^ truuuuuu
22:32
there are two major thai places and they have very similar names bc a divorced husband and wife own them lol
22:32
personally i think taste of thai is better than taste of thai express but thats just me
i had pho tho and it was really good and huge portions
texaslawhopefully
22:32
Glad they have good Thai food, I love Thai food! Can’t wait to visit :)
22:33
when tex goes to ithaca i want to come
Dkk
22:34
Crying Tiger, best Thai dish.
damn im so hungry all i had today was a curry tonkatsu and buldak
and it was a lil baby noodle cup
vvv hungry
22:36
curry tonkatsu so yummeh
22:36
whats even open rn? pizza?
CTB is it i think
22:37
is collegetown pizza not open
22:37
i used to get a slice from there or wings over at like 1am after my shift at the restaurant
Dkk
22:48
Ross Ulbricht free. God Bless Trump. Huge win.
JeremyFragrance
22:54
agreed
texaslawhopefully
22:55
This is an interesting read: https://thedispatch.com/article/birthright-citizenship-trump-implications/
Dkk
23:01
I mean, idk how it's possible to end birth right citizenship without amending the constitution because to me the 14th amendment is pretty clear about it.
ross ulbricht tried to hire a hitman to kill 5 people
i am not that sympathetic to him
Dkk
23:04
@KnowledgeableRitzyWasp: That might have been an FBI agent. It was most likely him and he was most likely doing it to retrieve stolen funds that corrupt FBI agents stole, but yeah moral gray area but me personally, cool with hitmen. It's not like it is uncommon to hire hitmen. I don't think the action itself is necessarily wrong but the intent behind it can be.
Dkk
23:05
Like, Boeing whistblowers being killed by hitmen = wrong but a guy hiring hitmen to retrieve stolen funds = good to me.
texaslawhopefully
23:05
@Dkk: Yeah, for sure. My guess is it'll go to SCOTUS and it'll be 8-1 or 7-2, saying that EO was unconstitutional.
Dkk
23:06
Indeed. I need a count for how many exectuive orders he has signed and how many already have pending lawsuits.
i've been away for a while what were the most recent waves? any this week?
LSD+ is ad-free, with DMs, discounts, case briefs & more.